Under Armour® Boxerjock
Thursday, September 4, 2008 | | |Under Armour® Boxerjock

- 100% PolyArmour polyester
- 3-in inseam
- Compression fit with minimal leg coverage
- HeatGear® moisture management
- Exposed elastic waistband with knit-in logos
Under Armour Boxerjock. This Under Armour short Boxer is cut for a comfortable fit with full leg coverage offering a lightweight compression fit. The breathable vent mesh performance pouch gives you support without sacrificing comfort. HeatGear fabric guarantees you're cool, dry and comfortable. 5 3/4" inseam. State Color and Size. Order Now! Under Armour Boxerjock
Great for summer & workouts (2008-07-17)
I work out at the gym 4-5 days a week, and need a brief type short for "support". I used 2xist briefs (which cost about the same) and they did a good job, but now that switched to these - WOW. Much more supportive and the material is much more skin-tight and slimmer material than the 2xist cotton briefs.
The walk to work today and the walk home yesterday is in jeans with these boxers, and these briefs just wick the sweat away.
They are expensive, which is why I only give 4 stars. If these were $10 a pop, I'd easily give them 5 stars. Totally worth buying if you are like me, you go to the gym after work and need a supportive brief &/or need a brief for outside in hot weather. Not sure how they will be in winter, due to the thin (but definitely not cheap) material.
Yep, they're underwear (2008-07-04)
Actually these are pretty comfortable, I wear them while hiking, biking, walking and talking. Sometimes while sleeping or watching TV but hardly ever while swimming. They're expensive but for what they are they do what they are suppose to.
Under Armour underwear (2008-05-16)
Good product. I'm disappointed that they were so expensive ($20 each), but they do the job. I won't order these again, as I found another brand that is half price and does the job just as well (Jockey brand, Go Mesh). I wore these Under Armours for my first 25k run (15.5 miles), and I never felt them, never got any chafing, and they were extremely, extremely comfortable. But at $20 each, they're a little expensive. Additionally, the term "boxerjock" I believe to be a misnomer. I didn't feel as if they were a true athletic supporter, but they supported me ok. No problems.
Well Worth the $$$$ (2008-05-03)
More expensive than I usually pay for undies and I'm notmally a brief guy. These have changed all that and they're well worth the extra coin. Working out, or just another day these are the most comfy undies I have. Just need UA to make them in more colors!
The best stuff out there (2008-04-04)
I bought a pair of Under Armour for my 18-year-old son to try out. He prefers it to every other kind of underwear he has ever worn. He loves physical training, and this stuff is really comfortable during workouts.
Under Armour® Boxerjockat Amazon.com Now
tags : a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h,i,j,k,l,m,n,o,p,q,r,s,t,u,v,w,x,y,z